Answers in Genesis Tries to Discredit Radiometric Dating and the Age of the Earth. Feat Purple Dan
Since the former is radioactive and decays at a constant pace while the latter is stable, the ratio between the two can determine the age of anything that was on the earth and breathed.
Radioactive isotopes like 14 C decay at a constant rate relative to the amount of material present. In the case of 14 C, it has a half-life of 5, years. This means that if you have 2 grams of 14 C today, in 5, years you will have 1 gram of 14 C. Since 14 C has a steady half-life and the known ratio of our environment is currently at 1 part 14 C to 1 trillion parts 12 C, scientists can use this to determine how long ago the creature leaving behind their remains had died. There are two major assumptions that are impossible to prove or disprove.
The first is that the earth is old. Based upon the Big Bang theory as well as the theory of evolution, most scientists and therefore the general public believe that the universe and the world are billions of years old. This assumption allows for 14 C dating to apply to former-living material as old as 80, years before it becomes too difficult to distinguish between 14 C radiation and other radioactive isotopes such as Potassium 40 K.
The second assumption is that the level of 14 C in the environment is mostly constant.
Carbon dating is a method, based on utraveltimefrom.comovable assumptions about the past, used to date things that contain carbon (e.g. fossils). It can only give maximum ages of around 50, years and yet C has been found in fossils and diamonds thought to be millions and billions of years old respectively. Specifically, we know that carbon has varied in the past due to a stronger magnetic field on the earth and changing cycles in sunspot activity. So when objects of known historical dates are dated using radiocarbon dating, we find that carbon dates are accurate back to only about B.C.Àâòîð: Dr. Andrew A. Snelling. The most well-known of all the radiometric dating methods is radiocarbon dating. Although many people think radiocarbon dating is used to date rocks, it is limited to dating things that contain the element carbon and were once alive (like fossils).Àâòîð: Dr. Andrew A. Snelling.
It was believed for two centuries that it was an absolute constant, but scientists have recently discovered that it fluctuates based upon several different factors. This is the biggest assumption that is challenged by many scientists today because 14 C is produced when cosmic rays hit the upper atmosphere and change Nitrogen into 14 C. Since the amount of cosmic rays hitting these Nitrogen atoms is affected by the magnetic field of the earth and that field has been in a diminishing state since it was first observed in the midth century, many scientists have a hard time assuming that the levels of 14 C in the atmosphere is anywhere near constant enough to use in measurements.
Today it is about 10 percent weaker than it was when German mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss started keeping tabs on it inscientists say. If one were to adjust their assumptions and apply the Biblical telling of Creation, Carbon Dating still fits.
The reason that it fits is based upon the Flood of Noah. The magnetic field is decaying. The world itself has been dramatically changed on two occasions according to the Bible - during the Great Flood and in the resulting shifts that occurred. The Genesis Flood tells of a planet that was much more rich in life than it is today. One particularly interesting theory shows that the majority of the world has a single large land mass. When a huge shelf of water 10 miles beneath the earth was released, the very shape of the earth was changed.
Plates moved across the planet, forming the continents and oceans as we see them today. It creates amazing scientific explanations for things such as the Grand Canyon, portions of the fossil record, and the tectonic plates. It also partially explains the various ages associated with fossils of creatures from before the flood. As the shelf of water spewed forth into the land and the land masses themselves collapsed into the void, the earth may have in essence, shrunk.
This would have had the same effect as a spinning ice skater pulling in her limbs to accelerate her rotation. The days were measured at per year prior to the flood and eventually the calendars were shifted to the current day model. Did this happen because the earth had started spinning more rapidly, causing more days to occur during a single revolution around the sun?
If one believes the story of Noah and applies that assumption to current scientific models, they do not conflict. That lack of conflict includes Carbon Dating. In many ways, Carbon Dating is another example of science demonstrating the literal truths found in the Bible.
This article is part of the Compassion and Fear Series. It supposedly dates some material beyond 6, years. Because the theory of evolution requires millions of years to be viable, a young earth position is in direct opposition to that theory. However, in many cases carbon dating has not assisted evolutionists in the attempt to prove the theory of evolution. Take coal, for example. If in fact it is millions of years old it should have no traces of carbon in it.
However scientists to date have not yet found any coal completely lacking all carbon If a fossil only has. In theory the amount of carbon 14 never goes to zero.
However, for practical purposes we cannot measure passed a certain amount. There should be no measurable carbon 14 after about 40, - 50, years.
Genesis and carbon dating
Yet it has proven impossible to find any natural source of carbon below Pleistocene Ice Age strata that does not contain significant amounts of carbon 14, even though such strata are supposed to be millions or billions of years old. These constitute very strong evidence that the earth is only thousands, not billions, of years old. Now think for a minute of what this means. The textbooks say that coal formed million years ago.
However, when coal is tested it still has carbon How is that possible? If all of the carbon 14 atoms would have disappeared at a maximum ofyears, why would there still be carbon 14 atoms in coal? Obviously it is not million years old.
Carbon Dating Does Not Disprove the Bible
Also diamonds, which they say formed millions and millions of years ago, still have carbon 14 in them. So how do you get carbon 14 in diamonds? Again it is obvious that they are not millions of years old.
The carbon dating assumptions need to be pointed out. It is also losing carbon 14 through decay. The question is how long would it take the atmosphere to reach a stage called equilibrium? They wanted to figure out how long it would take the atmosphere to reach a point where the construction rate and the destruction rate of carbon 14 was the same.
They determined that it would take about 30, years to reach this equilibrium state. They made two bad assumptions after they came up with this calculation.
They assumed that the earth was millions of years old and then assumed that they could ignore the equilibrium problem. It has been discovered that the earth has still not reached equilibrium. Now think about that for a minute. If radiocarbon is still forming faster than it is decaying, that means the earth is less than 30, years old.
· Doesn't radiometric dating prove the earth is billions of years old Jim Mason PhD - Duration: John Hartnett 8, viewsÀâòîð: Genesis Apologetics. This article will explain how carbon dating is supposed to work and then show you the serious flaws with this process. It is derived from a transcript of Dr. Hovind’s video, which you can see above. (His videos and materials are not copyrighted.) Carbon dating was not invented until Many people believe that carbon dating has proven the Biblical timeline is not scientifically valid. It supposedly dates some material beyond 6, years. Because the theory of evolution requires millions of years to be viable, a young earth position is in direct opposition to that theory. However, in many cases carbon dating has not assisted.
It also means that you cannot carbon date anything! The reason is because you would have to know when the fossil was alive to know how much carbon 14 was in the atmosphere at that time. It simply does not work. If you find a fossil in the dirt, the amount of carbon 14 can be measured and the rate of decay can be determined.How Radiometric Dating Works: Relative not Absolute Ages
However, that is all that can be determined. It is impossible to know how much carbon 14 was in it at death and it is impossible to know if carbon 14 has always decayed at the same rate. If the earth had a canopy of water above the atmosphere, or a canopy of ice, that would have blocked out a lot of the radiation from the sun. This would have prevented most of the carbon 14 from even forming.